Shield) in lieu of a harness. However, Cybex states the side impact final rule did not consider CRSs that use a forward restraining surface. Cybex argued that the 25-degree dummy arm positioning required in the new FMVSS No. 213a standard could not be met in forward facing CRSs with restraining https://william-ennis-2.federatedjournals.com/the-best-side-of-federal-motor-vehicle-safety-standard-seat-belt-webbing